ACA Says Not Enough Research to Prove Chiropractic Works in Kids
Notice the focus on symptoms only.
The statement from the ACA continued:
"The American Chiropractic Association says that while treatments for children are safe and effective, more research is needed to prove they work."
Read that again - The brain trust at the ACA doesn't know that EFFECTIVE means it works.
The ACA was joined in its negative portrayal of the chiropractic care of children by representatives from Children's National Hospital and the Mayo Clinic Children's Center.
According to Sean Tabaie MD, an orthopedic surgeon at Children’s National Hospital in D.C:
“Ultimately, there is no way you’re going to get an improvement in a newborn from a manipulation. The only thing that you might possibly cause is harm."
Anthony Stans MD, a pediatric orthopedic surgeon at Mayo Clinic Children’s Center in Rochester, Minn weighed in as well stating:
“To my knowledge, there is little to no evidence that chiropractic care changes the natural history of any disease or condition.”
Keep in mind that the ACA just recently endorsed a brand of car seats stating:
The ACA can figure out what kind of car seats are make your ass feel good but they can't seem to figure out why kids benefit from chiropractic?
And car seats are not the only thing the ACA is an expert in - they also endorse mattresses. Here is ACA President and leader at Northwestern Chiropractic College Michelle Maiers:
OK ACA - Let's see a description of the reviews, a copy of the analyses and the results of the testing for both the car seats and the mattresses.
CLICK Here for more on that story
What else besides chiropractic care for children can't the ACA endorse that is actually chiropractic?
How about immune function?
CLICK HERE for more on that story
If you are scratching your head and wondering how and why the ACA would contradict itself and spread such misinformation then you have not been following along. The ACA is in lockstep with the WFC controlling the profession and dragging chiropractic away from any focus on the subluxation and the adjustment and into primary care, allopathy and drugs. Chiropractic is a modality to them and the adjustment (manipulation in their lingo) is only good for back pain and headaches.
The ACA, WFC and the rest of the anti subluxation, anti-vitalistic Cartel that runs the profession has set up two standards. One for them that allows them to claim (without providing credible evidence) that a massage chair confers widespread health and "wellness" benefits, that one mattress or car seat is better than another - but when it comes to the relationship between the nervous and immune systems and chiropractic's role in optimizing that relationship or whether children should get chiropractic care they falsely claim there is not enough credible evidence.
We now have cultural authority because we can tell the public what car seats, mattresses and massage chairs are good for you. Just like the car, mattress and furniture salesperson.
Blogs
- The Chiropractic Cartel: A Look Back at Bias in Accreditation and its Imact on Today's Profession
- Inside Montana's Chiropractic Monopoly: ACA & MCA's Brazen Board Takeover
- Concerns Grow About Control of the NY State Chiropractic Board by the ACA - Use of X-ray in NY Under Threat
- Chiropractic Students Under Siege: NBCE's Part IV Con Game
- NBCE Pushes Flawed Justification for Part IV Centralization