X-Rays More Reliable Than Visual Analysis for Detecting Pelvic Misalignments

Research News Staff
X-Rays More Reliable Than Visual Analysis for Detecting Pelvic Misalignments

New study highlights the importance of radiographic methods in chiropractic assessments

In the chiropractic world, a heated debate has long raged over the most effective ways to identify and diagnose spinal and pelvic misalignments. For example, one side advocates for subjective evaluations such as visual analysis, citing its practicality and immediate application. Another camp emphasizes the scientific rigor of radiographic analysis, specifically X-ray methods. A new study, recently published in the Annals of Vertebral Subluxation Research, aims to help settle this debate, and its findings appear to tilt the scales in favor of radiographic methods.

CLICK HERE to review the study

About the Study

Conducted by a team of researchers at Sherman College of Chiropractic in Spartanburg, SC, the study compared the efficiency of radiographic (X-ray) analysis and visual analysis in determining pelvic misalignments in 30 patients. The researchers used the Gonstead system, a specific chiropractic technique for conducting line analysis on X-rays. The clinicians performing the visual assessments were unaware of the X-ray findings, and vice versa.

Key Findings

What the study ultimately discovered was a significant discrepancy between the two diagnostic methods:

- When "foot flare" was visually assessed, there was a mere 41% agreement with the X-ray findings.
- Similarly, visual assessments based on "gluteal width" also showed only 41% agreement with the radiographic analysis.
- When "gluteal fold heights" were used for visual assessment, the agreement dipped even lower to 38%.

In stark contrast, the inter-examiner agreement for radiographic analysis was notably high, reaching a 100% agreement in many cases.

Why This Matters

Chiropractic care focuses on the management of vertebral subluxations—misalignments in the spine that can cause obstructions and interfere with nerve function. Visual analysis, which evaluates factors like foot flare, gluteal widths, and gluteal folds, has been a traditional method used for quick assessments. However, the study indicates that this method is highly unreliable compared to radiographic analysis.

The Debate over X-ray Use

Matthew McCoy DC, MPH, a chiropractor and editor of the journal that published the study, mentioned that this research discredits policies adopted by insurance companies and organizations like the American Chiropractic Association (ACA), which restrict the use of X-rays by chiropractors. He labeled such restrictions as a "public health threat," given the importance of precise analysis for effective treatment.

Future Directions

The authors of the study have called for further research to explore the clinical implications of their findings. While this study is a pilot and the sample size is relatively small, its results are compelling enough to warrant further investigation.

Concluding Remarks

In a field where precision is key to patient well-being, the new study has cast serious doubts over the reliability of visual analysis methods for diagnosing pelvic misalignments. With its thorough approach and compelling results, the study serves as a strong argument for the importance of radiographic analysis in chiropractic care, reigniting the debate over best practices in spinal health assessments.

McCoy Press